Comparison
Company
Score
Quality
Valuation
Financial
Technical
Why is FSE Lifestyle Services Ltd. ?
1
High Management Efficiency with a high ROE of 95.84%
2
Company's ability to service its debt is strong with a healthy EBIT to Interest (avg) ratio of 57.21
3
Negative results in Dec 24
- OPERATING CASH FLOW(Y) Lowest at HKD 496.89 MM
- ROCE(HY) Lowest at 49.1%
- INTEREST COVERAGE RATIO(Q) Lowest at 2,464.64
4
With ROE of 43.04%, it has a Attractive valuation with a 2.39 Price to Book Value
- Over the past year, while the stock has generated a return of 0.18%, its profits have fallen by -2.4%
5
Underperformed the market in the last 1 year
- The stock has generated a return of 0.18% in the last 1 year, much lower than market (Hang Seng Hong Kong) returns of 26.67%
How much should you hold?
- Overall Portfolio exposure to FSE Lifestyle Services Ltd. should be less than 10%
- Overall Portfolio exposure to Miscellaneous should be less than 30%
(If sector exposure > 30%, please use optimiser tool to see which are the best stocks to hold in Miscellaneous)
When to exit? - We will constantly monitor the company and suggest at the appropriate time to exit from the stock
Is FSE Lifestyle Services Ltd. for you?
Low Risk, Low Return
Absolute
Risk Adjusted
Volatility
FSE Lifestyle Services Ltd.
1.25%
-0.08
12.36%
Hang Seng Hong Kong
27.36%
1.03
25.88%
Quality key factors
Factor
Value
Sales Growth (5y)
10.82%
EBIT Growth (5y)
6.90%
EBIT to Interest (avg)
57.21
Debt to EBITDA (avg)
0
Net Debt to Equity (avg)
-0.16
Sales to Capital Employed (avg)
7.63
Tax Ratio
15.30%
Dividend Payout Ratio
40.06%
Pledged Shares
0
Institutional Holding
0
ROCE (avg)
261.07%
ROE (avg)
95.84%
Valuation Key Factors 
Factor
Value
P/E Ratio
6
Industry P/E
Price to Book Value
2.39
EV to EBIT
4.47
EV to EBITDA
3.93
EV to Capital Employed
2.66
EV to Sales
0.30
PEG Ratio
NA
Dividend Yield
NA
ROCE (Latest)
59.56%
ROE (Latest)
43.04%
Technical key factors
Indicator
Weekly
Monthly
MACD
Mildly Bearish
Bullish
RSI
Bullish
No Signal
Bollinger Bands
Bearish
Sideways
Moving Averages
Mildly Bullish (Daily)
KST
Bearish
Bullish
Dow Theory
Mildly Bearish
Mildly Bullish
OBV
No Trend
Mildly Bearish
Technical Movement
Not enough Data to analyse Financial Trend
Not enough Data to analyse Financial Trend
Here's what is working for FSE Lifestyle Services Ltd.
Inventory Turnover Ratio
Highest at 426.49%
in the last five Semi-Annual periodsMOJO Watch
Company has been able to sell its inventory faster
Inventory Turnover Ratio
Here's what is not working for FSE Lifestyle Services Ltd.
Operating Cash Flow
Lowest at HKD 496.89 MM and Fallen
In each year in the last three yearsMOJO Watch
The company's cash revenues from business operations are falling
Operating Cash Flows (HKD MM)
Interest Coverage Ratio
Lowest at 2,464.64
in the last five periodsMOJO Watch
The company's ability to manage interest payments is deteriorating
Operating Profit to Interest
Interest
Highest at HKD 12.76 MM
in the last five periods and Increased by 44.2% (QoQ)MOJO Watch
Rising interest cost signifies increased borrowings
Interest Paid (HKD MM)
Pre-Tax Profit
Lowest at HKD 285.02 MM
in the last five periodsMOJO Watch
Near term Pre-Tax Profit trend is negative
Pre-Tax Profit (HKD MM)
Net Profit
Lowest at HKD 241.62 MM
in the last five periodsMOJO Watch
Near term Net Profit trend is negative
Net Profit (HKD MM)
EPS
Lowest at HKD 0.53
in the last five periodsMOJO Watch
Declining profitability; company has created lower earnings for shareholders
EPS (HKD)
Debt-Equity Ratio
Highest at -14.41 %
in the last five Semi-Annual periodsMOJO Watch
The company is borrowing more to fund its operations; it's liquidity situation may be stressed
Debt-Equity Ratio
Debtors Turnover Ratio
Lowest at 2.78%
in the last five Semi-Annual periodsMOJO Watch
Company's pace of selling Debtors has slowed
Debtors Turnover Ratio
Dividend Payout Ratio
Lowest at 40%
in the last five yearsMOJO Watch
Company is distributing lower proportion of profits generated as dividend
DPR (%)
Raw Material Cost
Grown by 11.9% (YoY)
MOJO Watch
The company's ability to pass on the cost of raw materials to customers has deteriorated; this may lead to a fall in profit margin
Raw Material Cost as a percentage of Sales






