Greenland Technologies Holding Corp.

  • Market Cap: Micro Cap
  • Industry: Industrial Manufacturing
  • ISIN: VGG4095T1075
USD
0.76
0.04 (6.19%)
  • Price Points
  • Score
  • Mojo Parameters
  • Total Return
  • News and Corporate Actions
  • Key factors
  • Shareholding
  • Financials
  • CompanyCV
stock-recommendationScore
Click here to find our call on this stock
Strong Sell
Sell
Hold
Buy
Strong Buy

Comparison

Company
Score
Quality
Valuation
Financial
Technical
Perma-Pipe International Holdings, Inc.
Taylor Devices, Inc.
Amtech Systems, Inc.
Greenland Technologies Holding Corp.
Sono-Tek Corp.
Nauticus Robotics, Inc.
Rapid Micro Biosystems, Inc.
Knightscope, Inc.
KULR Technology Group, Inc.
ClearSign Technologies Corp.
Techprecision Corp.

Why is Greenland Technologies Holding Corp. ?

1
Healthy long term growth as Net Sales has grown by an annual rate of 14.93% and Operating profit at 25.92%
2
The company has declared Positive results for the last 4 consecutive quarters
  • NET SALES(Q) Highest at USD 23.4 MM
  • NET PROFIT(Q) At USD 4.39 MM has Grown at 135.64%
  • RAW MATERIAL COST(Y) Fallen by -23.48% (YoY)
3
With ROE of 14.33%, it has a very attractive valuation with a 0.22 Price to Book Value
  • Over the past year, while the stock has generated a return of -38.58%, its profits have risen by 152.1% ; the PEG ratio of the company is 0
4
Increasing Participation by Institutional Investors
  • Institutional investors have increased their stake by 1.3% over the previous quarter and collectively hold 6.86% of the company
  • These investors have better capability and resources to analyse fundamentals of companies than most retail investors
5
Consistent Underperformance against the benchmark over the last 3 years
  • Along with generating -38.58% returns in the last 1 year, the stock has also underperformed S&P 500 in each of the last 3 annual periods
stock-recommendationReal-Time Research Report

Verdict Report

How much should you hold?

  1. Overall Portfolio exposure to Greenland Technologies Holding Corp. should be less than 10%
  2. Overall Portfolio exposure to Industrial Manufacturing should be less than 30%

(If sector exposure > 30%, please use optimiser tool to see which are the best stocks to hold in Industrial Manufacturing)

When to exit? - We will constantly monitor the company and suggest at the appropriate time to exit from the stock

Is Greenland Technologies Holding Corp. for you?

High Risk, Low Return

Absolute
Risk Adjusted
Volatility
Greenland Technologies Holding Corp.
-40.0%
-0.35
123.05%
S&P 500
13.68%
0.71
19.28%
stock-recommendationQuality
stock-summaryManagement Risk
stock-summaryGrowth
stock-summaryCapital Structure
stock-recommendation
Quality grade scale :

Below Average, Average, Good, Excellent

Quality key factors

Factor
Value
Sales Growth (5y)
14.93%
EBIT Growth (5y)
25.92%
EBIT to Interest (avg)
2.91
Debt to EBITDA (avg)
1.95
Net Debt to Equity (avg)
0.01
Sales to Capital Employed (avg)
0.91
Tax Ratio
13.76%
Dividend Payout Ratio
0
Pledged Shares
0
Institutional Holding
5.56%
ROCE (avg)
9.79%
ROE (avg)
12.01%
stock-recommendationValuation

Valuation Scorecard stock-summary

stock-recommendation
Valuation grade scale :

Very Risky, Risky, Very Expensive, Expensive, Fair, Attractive, Very Attractive

Valuation Key Factors stock-summary

Factor
Value
P/E Ratio
2
Industry P/E
Price to Book Value
0.22
EV to EBIT
0.19
EV to EBITDA
0.16
EV to Capital Employed
0.03
EV to Sales
0.02
PEG Ratio
0.01
Dividend Yield
NA
ROCE (Latest)
18.51%
ROE (Latest)
14.33%
stock-recommendationTechnicals

Technical key factors

Indicator
Weekly
Monthly
MACD
Bearish
Bearish
RSI
No Signal
No Signal
Bollinger Bands
Mildly Bearish
Mildly Bearish
Moving Averages
Bearish (Daily)
KST
Bearish
Bearish
Dow Theory
Mildly Bearish
Mildly Bullish
OBV
Mildly Bullish
Mildly Bearish
stock-recommendation Technical Indicator Scale: Bearish, Mildly Bearish, Sideways, Mildly Bullish, Bullish  Turned 
Technical Movement
stock-recommendationFinancial Trend

Financial Trend Scorecard stock-summary

stock-recommendation
Financial Trend scale:

Very Negative, Negative, Flat, Positive, Very Positive, Outstanding

12What is working for the Company
NET SALES(Q)

Highest at USD 23.4 MM

NET PROFIT(Q)

At USD 4.39 MM has Grown at 135.64%

RAW MATERIAL COST(Y)

Fallen by -23.48% (YoY

CASH AND EQV(HY)

Highest at USD 56.64 MM

DEBT-EQUITY RATIO (HY)

Lowest at -18.05 %

DEBTORS TURNOVER RATIO(HY)

Highest at 1.97 times

OPERATING PROFIT(Q)

Highest at USD 5.59 MM

PRE-TAX PROFIT(Q)

Highest at USD 5.98 MM

-6What is not working for the Company
NET PROFIT(HY)

At USD 1.09 MM has Grown at -70.22%

Here's what is working for Greenland Technologies Holding Corp.

Net Sales
Highest at USD 23.4 MM and Grown
In each period in the last five periods
MOJO Watch
Near term sales trend is very positive

Net Sales (USD MM)

Pre-Tax Profit
At USD 5.98 MM has Grown at 115%
over average net sales of the previous four periods of USD 2.78 MM
MOJO Watch
Near term Pre-Tax Profit trend is very positive

Pre-Tax Profit (USD MM)

Net Profit
At USD 4.39 MM has Grown at 135.64%
over average net sales of the previous four periods of USD 1.86 MM
MOJO Watch
Near term Net Profit trend is very positive

Net Profit (USD MM)

Operating Profit
Highest at USD 5.59 MM
in the last five periods
MOJO Watch
Near term Operating Profit trend is positive

Operating Profit (USD MM)

Pre-Tax Profit
Highest at USD 5.98 MM
in the last five periods
MOJO Watch
Near term Pre-Tax Profit trend is positive

Pre-Tax Profit (USD MM)

Cash and Eqv
Highest at USD 56.64 MM
in the last six Semi-Annual periods
MOJO Watch
Short Term liquidity is improving

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Debt-Equity Ratio
Lowest at -18.05 %
in the last five Semi-Annual periods
MOJO Watch
The company has been reducing its borrowing as compared to equity capital

Debt-Equity Ratio

Debtors Turnover Ratio
Highest at 1.97 times
in the last five Semi-Annual periods
MOJO Watch
Company has been able to sell its Debtors faster

Debtors Turnover Ratio

Raw Material Cost
Fallen by -23.48% (YoY)
MOJO Watch
The company's ability to pass on the cost of raw materials to customers has improved; this may lead to a rise in profit margin

Raw Material Cost as a percentage of Sales