Why is Liaoning Dingjide Petrochemical Co., Ltd. ?
1
High Debt Company with a Debt to Equity ratio (avg) at times
- Poor long term growth as Net Sales has grown by an annual rate of 2.64% and Operating profit at -149.36% over the last 5 years
- High Debt Company with a Debt to Equity ratio (avg) at times
- The company has been able to generate a Return on Equity (avg) of 6.14% signifying low profitability per unit of shareholders funds
2
Poor long term growth as Net Sales has grown by an annual rate of 2.64% and Operating profit at -149.36% over the last 5 years
3
The company has declared Negative results for the last 9 consecutive quarters
- INTEREST(HY) At CNY 8.19 MM has Grown at 77.5%
- PRE-TAX PROFIT(Q) At CNY -4.86 MM has Fallen at -232.12%
- NET PROFIT(Q) At CNY -3.37 MM has Fallen at -180.13%
4
Risky -
- The stock is trading risky as compared to its average historical valuations
- Over the past year, while the stock has generated a return of -2.70%, its profits have fallen by -170.7%
5
Below par performance in long term as well as near term
- Along with generating -2.70% returns in the last 1 year, the stock has also underperformed China Shanghai Composite in the last 3 years, 1 year and 3 months
How much should you sell?
- All quantity irrespective of whether you are making profits or losses
(If sector exposure > 30%, please use optimiser tool to see which are the best stocks to hold in Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology)
When to re-enter? - We will constantly monitor the company and review our call based on new data
Is Liaoning Dingjide Petrochemical Co., Ltd. for you?
High Risk, Medium Return
Absolute
Risk Adjusted
Volatility
Liaoning Dingjide Petrochemical Co., Ltd.
-100.0%
0.32
40.41%
China Shanghai Composite
15.85%
1.09
14.56%
Quality key factors
Factor
Value
Sales Growth (5y)
2.64%
EBIT Growth (5y)
-149.36%
EBIT to Interest (avg)
35.61
Debt to EBITDA (avg)
26.86
Net Debt to Equity (avg)
1.49
Sales to Capital Employed (avg)
0.36
Tax Ratio
17.59%
Dividend Payout Ratio
0
Pledged Shares
0
Institutional Holding
0
ROCE (avg)
7.30%
ROE (avg)
6.14%
Valuation Key Factors 
Factor
Value
P/E Ratio
NA (Loss Making)
Industry P/E
Price to Book Value
1.43
EV to EBIT
-282.85
EV to EBITDA
86.28
EV to Capital Employed
1.16
EV to Sales
5.75
PEG Ratio
NA
Dividend Yield
NA
ROCE (Latest)
-0.41%
ROE (Latest)
-1.12%
Technical key factors
Indicator
Weekly
Monthly
MACD
Mildly Bearish
Mildly Bullish
RSI
No Signal
No Signal
Bollinger Bands
Bearish
Mildly Bullish
Moving Averages
Mildly Bullish (Daily)
KST
Bullish
Dow Theory
No Trend
No Trend
OBV
No Trend
No Trend
Technical Movement
3What is working for the Company
OPERATING CASH FLOW(Y)
Highest at CNY 136.21 MM
-28What is not working for the Company
INTEREST(HY)
At CNY 8.19 MM has Grown at 77.5%
PRE-TAX PROFIT(Q)
At CNY -4.86 MM has Fallen at -232.12%
NET PROFIT(Q)
At CNY -3.37 MM has Fallen at -180.13%
ROCE(HY)
Lowest at -1.23%
RAW MATERIAL COST(Y)
Grown by 51.64% (YoY
DEBT-EQUITY RATIO
(HY)
Highest at 149.37 %
Here's what is working for Liaoning Dingjide Petrochemical Co., Ltd.
Operating Cash Flow
Highest at CNY 136.21 MM and Grown
In each year in the last three yearsMOJO Watch
The company has generated higher cash revenues from business operations
Operating Cash Flows (CNY MM)
Here's what is not working for Liaoning Dingjide Petrochemical Co., Ltd.
Interest
At CNY 8.19 MM has Grown at 77.5%
over previous Semi-Annual periodMOJO Watch
Rising interest cost signifies increased borrowings
Interest Paid (CNY MM)
Pre-Tax Profit
At CNY -4.86 MM has Fallen at -232.12%
Year on Year (YoY)MOJO Watch
Near term Pre-Tax Profit trend is very negative
Pre-Tax Profit (CNY MM)
Net Profit
At CNY -3.37 MM has Fallen at -180.13%
Year on Year (YoY)MOJO Watch
Near term Net Profit trend is very negative
Net Profit (CNY MM)
Debt-Equity Ratio
Highest at 149.37 %
in the last five Semi-Annual periodsMOJO Watch
The company is borrowing more to fund its operations; it's liquidity situation may be stressed
Debt-Equity Ratio
Raw Material Cost
Grown by 51.64% (YoY)
MOJO Watch
The company's ability to pass on the cost of raw materials to customers has deteriorated; this may lead to a fall in profit margin
Raw Material Cost as a percentage of Sales






