Why is Mitsubishi Corp. ?
1
Poor Management Efficiency with a low ROCE of 4.99%
- The company has been able to generate a Return on Capital Employed (avg) of 4.99% signifying low profitability per unit of total capital (equity and debt)
2
High Debt Company with a Debt to Equity ratio (avg) at times
- High Debt Company with a Debt to Equity ratio (avg) at times
- The company has been able to generate a Return on Capital Employed (avg) of 4.99% signifying low profitability per unit of total capital (equity and debt)
3
High Debt company with Weak Long Term Fundamental Strength
4
Negative results in Jun 25
- PRE-TAX PROFIT(Q) At JPY 114,955 MM has Fallen at -56.61%
- NET PROFIT(9M) At JPY 540,233.44 MM has Grown at -37.93%
- ROCE(HY) Lowest at 8.66%
5
With ROCE of 2.98%, it has a very attractive valuation with a 1.17 Enterprise value to Capital Employed
- The stock is trading at a premium compared to its peers' average historical valuations
- Over the past year, while the stock has generated a return of 43.53%, its profits have risen by 3.1% ; the PEG ratio of the company is 1.5
- At the current price, the company has a high dividend yield of 0
How much should you hold?
- Overall Portfolio exposure to Mitsubishi Corp. should be less than 10%
- Overall Portfolio exposure to Trading & Distributors should be less than 30%
(If sector exposure > 30%, please use optimiser tool to see which are the best stocks to hold in Trading & Distributors)
When to exit? - We will constantly monitor the company and suggest at the appropriate time to exit from the stock
Is Mitsubishi Corp. for you?
Low Risk, High Return
Absolute
Risk Adjusted
Volatility
Mitsubishi Corp.
43.53%
551.21
26.74%
Japan Nikkei 225
28.54%
1.11
25.75%
Quality key factors
Factor
Value
Sales Growth (5y)
4.73%
EBIT Growth (5y)
0.73%
EBIT to Interest (avg)
6.76
Debt to EBITDA (avg)
3.66
Net Debt to Equity (avg)
0.33
Sales to Capital Employed (avg)
1.40
Tax Ratio
30.04%
Dividend Payout Ratio
42.20%
Pledged Shares
0
Institutional Holding
0.03%
ROCE (avg)
4.99%
ROE (avg)
12.06%
Valuation Key Factors 
Factor
Value
P/E Ratio
11
Industry P/E
Price to Book Value
1.23
EV to EBIT
39.33
EV to EBITDA
17.34
EV to Capital Employed
1.17
EV to Sales
0.78
PEG Ratio
1.50
Dividend Yield
0.01%
ROCE (Latest)
2.98%
ROE (Latest)
11.51%
Technical key factors
Indicator
Weekly
Monthly
MACD
Mildly Bearish
Mildly Bullish
RSI
No Signal
No Signal
Bollinger Bands
Mildly Bullish
Bullish
Moving Averages
Bullish (Daily)
KST
Mildly Bearish
Bullish
Dow Theory
No Trend
Mildly Bullish
OBV
Bullish
Bullish
Technical Movement
0What is working for the Company
NO KEY POSITIVE TRIGGERS
-18What is not working for the Company
PRE-TAX PROFIT(Q)
At JPY 114,955 MM has Fallen at -56.61%
NET PROFIT(9M)
At JPY 540,233.44 MM has Grown at -37.93%
ROCE(HY)
Lowest at 8.66%
INVENTORY TURNOVER RATIO(HY)
Lowest at 8.44%
RAW MATERIAL COST(Y)
Grown by 26.87% (YoY
NET SALES(Q)
Lowest at JPY 4,218,706 MM
Here's what is not working for Mitsubishi Corp.
Pre-Tax Profit
At JPY 114,955 MM has Fallen at -56.61%
over average net sales of the previous four periods of JPY 264,954.75 MMMOJO Watch
Near term Pre-Tax Profit trend is very negative
Pre-Tax Profit (JPY MM)
Net Profit
At JPY 328,912.71 MM has Grown at -46.13%
Year on Year (YoY)MOJO Watch
Near term Net Profit trend is very negative
Net Profit (JPY MM)
Net Sales
At JPY 4,218,706 MM has Fallen at -9.36%
over average net sales of the previous four periods of JPY 4,654,400.25 MMMOJO Watch
Near term sales trend is very negative
Net Sales (JPY MM)
Pre-Tax Profit
Lowest at JPY 114,955 MM and Fallen
In each period in the last five periodsMOJO Watch
Near term Pre-Tax Profit trend is very negative
Pre-Tax Profit (JPY MM)
Inventory Turnover Ratio
Lowest at 8.44% and Fallen
In each half year in the last five Semi-Annual periodsMOJO Watch
Company's pace of selling inventory has slowed
Inventory Turnover Ratio
Net Sales
Lowest at JPY 4,218,706 MM
in the last five periodsMOJO Watch
Near term sales trend is negative
Net Sales (JPY MM)
Raw Material Cost
Grown by 26.87% (YoY)
MOJO Watch
The company's ability to pass on the cost of raw materials to customers has deteriorated; this may lead to a fall in profit margin
Raw Material Cost as a percentage of Sales






