Sinofortune Financial Holdings Ltd. (8123) Stock Recommendation | Score, Valuation, Technicals & Financial Trend

Score

Click here to find our call on this stock

Strong Sell

Sell

Hold

Buy

Strong Buy

Comparison

Company

Score

Quality

Valuation

Financial

Technical

Lianhua Supermarket Holdings Co., Ltd.

Veeko International Holdings Ltd.

Milan Station Holdings Ltd.

MOS House Group Ltd.

Ulferts International Ltd.

Centenary United Holdings Ltd.

Ausupreme International Holdings Ltd.

Mi Ming Mart Holdings Ltd.

China Art Financial Holdings Ltd.

Asia Commercial Holdings Ltd.

Sinofortune Financial Holdings Ltd.

Why is Sinofortune Financial Holdings Ltd. ?

Unrated Stock - No Analysis Available

Real-Time Research Report

Verdict Report

No Data Found

Is Sinofortune Financial Holdings Ltd. for you?

High Risk, High Return

Absolute

Risk Adjusted

Volatility

Sinofortune Financial Holdings Ltd.

-69.17%

0.72

2429.55%

Hang Seng Hong Kong

8.76%

0.45

19.63%

Quality

Management Risk

Growth

Capital Structure

Quality grade scale :

Below Average, Average, Good, Excellent

Quality key factors

Factor

Value

Sales Growth (5y)

-236.80%

EBIT Growth (5y)

-3.08%

EBIT to Interest (avg)

15.39

Debt to EBITDA (avg)

Negative Net Debt

Net Debt to Equity (avg)

Sales to Capital Employed (avg)

-9.29

Tax Ratio

17.95%

Dividend Payout Ratio

Pledged Shares

Institutional Holding

ROCE (avg)

12.32%

ROE (avg)

5.30%

Valuation

Valuation Scorecard

Valuation grade scale :

Very Risky, Risky, Very Expensive, Expensive, Fair, Attractive, Very Attractive

Valuation Key Factors

Factor

Value

P/E Ratio

NA (Loss Making)

Industry P/E

Price to Book Value

3.40

EV to EBIT

-0.47

EV to EBITDA

-0.57

EV to Capital Employed

5.11

EV to Sales

-0.83

PEG Ratio

Dividend Yield

ROCE (Latest)

-1084.39%

ROE (Latest)

-1073.57%

Technicals

Technical key factors

Indicator

Weekly

Monthly

MACD

Bearish

RSI

Bullish

Bollinger Bands

Bearish

Moving Averages

Bearish (Daily)

KST

Bearish

Dow Theory

No Trend

Bearish

OBV

No Trend

Mildly Bearish

Technical Indicator Scale: Bearish, Mildly Bearish, Sideways, Mildly Bullish, Bullish Turned

Technical Movement

Analyse All Technical Factors

Financial Trend

Financial Trend Scorecard

Financial Trend scale:

Very Negative, Negative, Flat, Positive, Very Positive, Outstanding

7What is working for the Company

NET PROFIT(HY)

Higher at HKD -21.8 MM

NET SALES(Q)

At HKD 24.62 MM has Grown at 67.06%

DEBT-EQUITY RATIO (HY)

Lowest at -1,599.71 %

-8What is not working for the Company

ROCE(HY)

Lowest at -184.26%

RAW MATERIAL COST(Y)

Grown by 126.87% (YoY

DEBTORS TURNOVER RATIO(HY)

Lowest at 1.06 times

PRE-TAX PROFIT(Q)

Lowest at HKD -21.88 MM

NET PROFIT(Q)

Lowest at HKD -21.8 MM

Here's what is working for Sinofortune Financial Holdings Ltd.

Net Sales

At HKD 24.62 MM has Grown at 67.06%

Year on Year (YoY)

MOJO Watch

Near term sales trend is very positive

Net Sales (HKD MM)

Debt-Equity Ratio

Lowest at -1,599.71 %

in the last five Semi-Annual periods

MOJO Watch

The company has been reducing its borrowing as compared to equity capital

Debt-Equity Ratio

Here's what is not working for Sinofortune Financial Holdings Ltd.

Pre-Tax Profit

Lowest at HKD -21.88 MM

in the last five periods

MOJO Watch

Near term Pre-Tax Profit trend is negative

Pre-Tax Profit (HKD MM)

Pre-Tax Profit

Fallen at -96.64%

Year on Year (YoY)

MOJO Watch

Near term Pre-Tax Profit trend is negative

Pre-Tax Profit (HKD MM)

Net Profit

Lowest at HKD -21.8 MM

in the last five periods

MOJO Watch

Near term Net Profit trend is negative

Net Profit (HKD MM)

Net Profit

Fallen at -102.84%

Year on Year (YoY)

MOJO Watch

Near term Net Profit trend is negative

Net Profit (HKD MM)

Debtors Turnover Ratio

Lowest at 1.06 times

in the last five Semi-Annual periods

MOJO Watch

Company's pace of selling Debtors has slowed

Debtors Turnover Ratio

Raw Material Cost

Grown by 126.87% (YoY)

MOJO Watch

The company's ability to pass on the cost of raw materials to customers has deteriorated; this may lead to a fall in profit margin

Raw Material Cost as a percentage of Sales