Why is Smith Douglas Homes Corp. ?
1
The company has declared negative results for the last 6 consecutive quarters
- OPERATING CASH FLOW(Y) Lowest at USD -35.47 MM
- INTEREST COVERAGE RATIO(Q) Lowest at 2,307.9
- RAW MATERIAL COST(Y) Grown by 13.76% (YoY)
2
With ROE of 143.18%, it has a expensive valuation with a 2.25 Price to Book Value
- Over the past year, while the stock has generated a return of -34.27%, its profits have fallen by -9%
3
Underperformed the market in the last 1 year
- Even though the market (S&P 500) has generated returns of 14.11% in the last 1 year, the stock has hugely underperformed and has generate negative returns of -34.27% returns
How much should you sell?
- All quantity irrespective of whether you are making profits or losses
(If sector exposure > 30%, please use optimiser tool to see which are the best stocks to hold in Furniture, Home Furnishing)
When to re-enter? - We will constantly monitor the company and review our call based on new data
Is Smith Douglas Homes Corp. for you?
High Risk, Low Return
Absolute
Risk Adjusted
Volatility
Smith Douglas Homes Corp.
-29.47%
-0.24
56.07%
S&P 500
16.49%
0.70
20.15%
Quality key factors
Factor
Value
Sales Growth (5y)
23.40%
EBIT Growth (5y)
26.60%
EBIT to Interest (avg)
51.69
Debt to EBITDA (avg)
0.13
Net Debt to Equity (avg)
0.39
Sales to Capital Employed (avg)
82.63
Tax Ratio
4.35%
Dividend Payout Ratio
0
Pledged Shares
0
Institutional Holding
100.00%
ROCE (avg)
242.76%
ROE (avg)
167.73%
Valuation Key Factors 
Factor
Value
P/E Ratio
2
Industry P/E
Price to Book Value
2.25
EV to EBIT
1.73
EV to EBITDA
1.70
EV to Capital Employed
1.90
EV to Sales
0.20
PEG Ratio
NA
Dividend Yield
NA
ROCE (Latest)
110.21%
ROE (Latest)
143.18%
Technical key factors
Indicator
Weekly
Monthly
MACD
Mildly Bullish
RSI
No Signal
No Signal
Bollinger Bands
Mildly Bullish
Mildly Bearish
Moving Averages
Mildly Bearish (Daily)
KST
Mildly Bullish
Dow Theory
Mildly Bullish
Mildly Bullish
OBV
No Trend
Mildly Bullish
Technical Movement
0What is working for the Company
NO KEY POSITIVE TRIGGERS
-20What is not working for the Company
OPERATING CASH FLOW(Y)
Lowest at USD -35.47 MM
INTEREST COVERAGE RATIO(Q)
Lowest at 2,307.9
RAW MATERIAL COST(Y)
Grown by 13.76% (YoY
DEBT-EQUITY RATIO
(HY)
Highest at 74.49 %
OPERATING PROFIT(Q)
Lowest at USD 17.82 MM
OPERATING PROFIT MARGIN(Q)
Lowest at 7.96 %
PRE-TAX PROFIT(Q)
Lowest at USD 17.18 MM
NET PROFIT(Q)
Lowest at USD 2.37 MM
EPS(Q)
Lowest at USD 0.26
Here's what is not working for Smith Douglas Homes Corp.
Operating Cash Flow
Lowest at USD -35.47 MM and Fallen
In each year in the last three yearsMOJO Watch
The company's cash revenues from business operations are falling
Operating Cash Flows (USD MM)
Interest Coverage Ratio
Lowest at 2,307.9
in the last five periodsMOJO Watch
The company's ability to manage interest payments is deteriorating
Operating Profit to Interest
Operating Profit
Lowest at USD 17.82 MM
in the last five periodsMOJO Watch
Near term Operating Profit trend is negative
Operating Profit (USD MM)
Operating Profit Margin
Lowest at 7.96 %
in the last five periodsMOJO Watch
Company's profit margin has deteriorated
Operating Profit to Sales
Pre-Tax Profit
Lowest at USD 17.18 MM
in the last five periodsMOJO Watch
Near term Pre-Tax Profit trend is negative
Pre-Tax Profit (USD MM)
Pre-Tax Profit
Fallen at -33.58%
Year on Year (YoY)MOJO Watch
Near term Pre-Tax Profit trend is negative
Pre-Tax Profit (USD MM)
Net Profit
Lowest at USD 2.37 MM
in the last five periodsMOJO Watch
Near term Net Profit trend is negative
Net Profit (USD MM)
Net Profit
Fallen at -35.13%
Year on Year (YoY)MOJO Watch
Near term Net Profit trend is negative
Net Profit (USD MM)
EPS
Lowest at USD 0.26
in the last five periodsMOJO Watch
Declining profitability; company has created lower earnings for shareholders
EPS (USD)
Debt-Equity Ratio
Highest at 74.49 %
in the last five Semi-Annual periodsMOJO Watch
The company is borrowing more to fund its operations; it's liquidity situation may be stressed
Debt-Equity Ratio
Raw Material Cost
Grown by 13.76% (YoY)
MOJO Watch
The company's ability to pass on the cost of raw materials to customers has deteriorated; this may lead to a fall in profit margin
Raw Material Cost as a percentage of Sales






