Solargiga Energy Holdings Ltd. (757) Stock Recommendation | Score, Valuation, Technicals & Financial Trend

Score

Click here to find our call on this stock

Strong Sell

Sell

Hold

Buy

Strong Buy

Comparison

Company

Score

Quality

Valuation

Financial

Technical

China Electronics Huada Technology Co. Ltd.

Pentamaster International Ltd.

Solomon Systech (International) Ltd.

Shanghai Fudan Microelectronics Group Co., Ltd.

Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corp.

Goldpac Group Ltd.

Hua Hong Semiconductor Ltd.

HG Semiconductor Ltd.

Xinte Energy Co., Ltd.

Xinyi Solar Holdings Ltd.

Solargiga Energy Holdings Ltd.

Why is Solargiga Energy Holdings Ltd. ?

Unrated Stock - No Analysis Available

Real-Time Research Report

Verdict Report

No Data Found

Is Solargiga Energy Holdings Ltd. for you?

High Risk, Low Return

Absolute

Risk Adjusted

Volatility

Solargiga Energy Holdings Ltd.

-1.45%

-0.80

65.30%

Hang Seng Hong Kong

8.76%

0.45

19.63%

Quality

Management Risk

Growth

Capital Structure

Quality grade scale :

Below Average, Average, Good, Excellent

Quality key factors

Factor

Value

Sales Growth (5y)

-10.58%

EBIT Growth (5y)

-242.15%

EBIT to Interest (avg)

0.10

Debt to EBITDA (avg)

1.59

Net Debt to Equity (avg)

0.19

Sales to Capital Employed (avg)

2.43

Tax Ratio

2.24%

Dividend Payout Ratio

Pledged Shares

Institutional Holding

ROCE (avg)

9.41%

ROE (avg)

18.61%

Valuation

Valuation Scorecard

Valuation grade scale :

Very Risky, Risky, Very Expensive, Expensive, Fair, Attractive, Very Attractive

Valuation Key Factors

Factor

Value

P/E Ratio

NA (Loss Making)

Industry P/E

Price to Book Value

0.32

EV to EBIT

-4.18

EV to EBITDA

-18.95

EV to Capital Employed

0.58

EV to Sales

0.26

PEG Ratio

Dividend Yield

ROCE (Latest)

-13.81%

ROE (Latest)

-19.76%

Technicals

Technical key factors

Indicator

Weekly

Monthly

MACD

Bearish

Mildly Bullish

RSI

Bullish

No Signal

Bollinger Bands

Mildly Bearish

Moving Averages

Bearish (Daily)

KST

Bearish

Mildly Bullish

Dow Theory

No Trend

OBV

No Trend

Technical Indicator Scale: Bearish, Mildly Bearish, Sideways, Mildly Bullish, Bullish Turned

Technical Movement

Analyse All Technical Factors

Financial Trend

Financial Trend Scorecard

Financial Trend scale:

Very Negative, Negative, Flat, Positive, Very Positive, Outstanding

2What is working for the Company

NET PROFIT(HY)

Higher at HKD -121.27 MM

-13What is not working for the Company

OPERATING CASH FLOW(Y)

Lowest at HKD -770.56 MM

ROCE(HY)

Lowest at -35.67%

DEBTORS TURNOVER RATIO(HY)

Lowest at 1.55 times

RAW MATERIAL COST(Y)

Grown by 44.73% (YoY

INVENTORY TURNOVER RATIO(HY)

Lowest at 4.64 times

NET SALES(Q)

Fallen at -29.56%

NET PROFIT(Q)

Lowest at HKD -121.27 MM

EPS(Q)

Lowest at HKD -0.06

Here's what is not working for Solargiga Energy Holdings Ltd.

Operating Cash Flow

Lowest at HKD -770.56 MM and Fallen

In each year in the last three years

MOJO Watch

The company's cash revenues from business operations are falling

Operating Cash Flows (HKD MM)

Debtors Turnover Ratio

Lowest at 1.55 times and Fallen

In each half year in the last five Semi-Annual periods

MOJO Watch

Company's pace of selling Debtors has slowed

Debtors Turnover Ratio

Net Sales

Fallen at -29.56%

Year on Year (YoY)

MOJO Watch

Near term sales trend is negative

Net Sales (HKD MM)

Net Profit

Lowest at HKD -121.27 MM

in the last five periods

MOJO Watch

Near term Net Profit trend is negative

Net Profit (HKD MM)

Net Profit

Fallen at -67.42%

Year on Year (YoY)

MOJO Watch

Near term Net Profit trend is negative

Net Profit (HKD MM)

EPS

Lowest at HKD -0.06

in the last five periods

MOJO Watch

Declining profitability; company has created lower earnings for shareholders

EPS (HKD)

Inventory Turnover Ratio

Lowest at 4.64 times

in the last five Semi-Annual periods

MOJO Watch

Company's pace of selling inventory has slowed

Inventory Turnover Ratio

Raw Material Cost

Grown by 44.73% (YoY)

MOJO Watch

The company's ability to pass on the cost of raw materials to customers has deteriorated; this may lead to a fall in profit margin

Raw Material Cost as a percentage of Sales