Comparison
Company
Score
Quality
Valuation
Financial
Technical
Why is Tianjin Development Holdings Ltd. ?
1
Weak Long Term Fundamental Strength with a -3.13% CAGR growth in Net Sales over the last 5 years
- Company's ability to service its debt is weak with a poor EBIT to Interest (avg) ratio of -1.57
2
Negative results in Dec 25
- ROCE(HY) Lowest at 3.34%
- DIVIDEND PAYOUT RATIO(Y) Lowest at 0%
- RAW MATERIAL COST(Y) Grown by 5.17% (YoY)
3
Underperformed the market in the last 1 year
- Even though the market (Hang Seng Hong Kong) has generated returns of 0.26% in the last 1 year, the stock has hugely underperformed and has generate negative returns of -10.78% returns
How much should you sell?
- All quantity irrespective of whether you are making profits or losses
(If sector exposure > 30%, please use optimiser tool to see which are the best stocks to hold in Other Utilities)
When to re-enter? - We will constantly monitor the company and review our call based on new data
Is Tianjin Development Holdings Ltd. for you?
Low Risk, Medium Return
Absolute
Risk Adjusted
Volatility
Tianjin Development Holdings Ltd.
-10.78%
0.37
25.46%
Hang Seng Hong Kong
0.26%
0.01
20.12%
Quality key factors
Factor
Value
Sales Growth (5y)
-3.13%
EBIT Growth (5y)
11.85%
EBIT to Interest (avg)
-0.84
Debt to EBITDA (avg)
0
Net Debt to Equity (avg)
-0.48
Sales to Capital Employed (avg)
0.24
Tax Ratio
19.54%
Dividend Payout Ratio
35.10%
Pledged Shares
0
Institutional Holding
0
ROCE (avg)
0.45%
ROE (avg)
4.88%
Valuation Key Factors 
Factor
Value
P/E Ratio
3
Industry P/E
Price to Book Value
0.17
EV to EBIT
30.55
EV to EBITDA
-19.22
EV to Capital Employed
-0.29
EV to Sales
-0.75
PEG Ratio
0.07
Dividend Yield
NA
ROCE (Latest)
Negative Capital Employed
ROE (Latest)
5.67%
Technical key factors
Indicator
Weekly
Monthly
MACD
Bearish
Mildly Bearish
RSI
No Signal
No Signal
Bollinger Bands
Bearish
Bearish
Moving Averages
Bearish (Daily)
KST
Bearish
Mildly Bearish
Dow Theory
Mildly Bearish
Mildly Bearish
OBV
Mildly Bearish
No Trend
Technical Movement
3What is working for the Company
NET PROFIT(Q)
At HKD 73.74 MM has Grown at 373.18%
-11What is not working for the Company
ROCE(HY)
Lowest at 3.34%
DIVIDEND PAYOUT RATIO(Y)
Lowest at 0%
RAW MATERIAL COST(Y)
Grown by 5.17% (YoY
CASH AND EQV(HY)
Lowest at HKD 6,627.35 MM
DEBT-EQUITY RATIO
(HY)
Highest at -35.55 %
DIVIDEND PER SHARE(HY)
Lowest at HKD 1.92
NET SALES(Q)
Lowest at HKD 1,477.61 MM
PRE-TAX PROFIT(Q)
Lowest at HKD -61.87 MM
EPS(Q)
Lowest at HKD 0.08
Here's what is working for Tianjin Development Holdings Ltd.
Net Profit
At HKD 73.74 MM has Grown at 373.18%
Year on Year (YoY)MOJO Watch
Near term Net Profit trend is very positive
Net Profit (HKD MM)
Here's what is not working for Tianjin Development Holdings Ltd.
Net Sales
Lowest at HKD 1,477.61 MM
in the last five periodsMOJO Watch
Near term sales trend is negative
Net Sales (HKD MM)
Pre-Tax Profit
Lowest at HKD -61.87 MM
in the last five periodsMOJO Watch
Near term Pre-Tax Profit trend is negative
Pre-Tax Profit (HKD MM)
Pre-Tax Profit
Fallen at -58.8%
Year on Year (YoY)MOJO Watch
Near term Pre-Tax Profit trend is negative
Pre-Tax Profit (HKD MM)
EPS
Lowest at HKD 0.08
in the last five periodsMOJO Watch
Declining profitability; company has created lower earnings for shareholders
EPS (HKD)
Cash and Eqv
Lowest at HKD 6,627.35 MM
in the last six Semi-Annual periodsMOJO Watch
Short Term liquidity is deteriorating
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Debt-Equity Ratio
Highest at -35.55 %
in the last five Semi-Annual periodsMOJO Watch
The company is borrowing more to fund its operations; it's liquidity situation may be stressed
Debt-Equity Ratio
Dividend per share
Lowest at HKD 1.92
in the last five yearsMOJO Watch
Company is distributing lower dividend than previous years
DPS (HKD)
Dividend Payout Ratio
Lowest at 0%
in the last five yearsMOJO Watch
Company is distributing lower proportion of profits generated as dividend
DPR (%)
Raw Material Cost
Grown by 5.17% (YoY)
MOJO Watch
The company's ability to pass on the cost of raw materials to customers has deteriorated; this may lead to a fall in profit margin
Raw Material Cost as a percentage of Sales






