Comparison
Company
Score
Quality
Valuation
Financial
Technical
Why is Top Spring International Holdings Ltd. ?
1
Strong Long Term Fundamental Strength with an average Return on Equity (ROE) of 10.21%
2
Poor long term growth as Operating profit has grown by an annual rate of -29.80%
3
Flat results in Jun 25
- ROCE(HY) Lowest at -29.51%
- DEBT-EQUITY RATIO (HY) Highest at 82.15 %
- RAW MATERIAL COST(Y) Grown by 90.03% (YoY)
4
With ROE of 10.94%, it has a Very Attractive valuation with a 0.09 Price to Book Value
- Over the past year, while the stock has generated a return of -8.57%, its profits have risen by 27.6% ; the PEG ratio of the company is 0
5
Consistent Underperformance against the benchmark over the last 3 years
- Along with generating -8.57% returns in the last 1 year, the stock has also underperformed Hang Seng Hong Kong in each of the last 3 annual periods
How much should you hold?
- Overall Portfolio exposure to Top Spring International Holdings Ltd. should be less than 10%
- Overall Portfolio exposure to Realty should be less than 30%
(If sector exposure > 30%, please use optimiser tool to see which are the best stocks to hold in Realty)
When to exit? - We will constantly monitor the company and suggest at the appropriate time to exit from the stock
Is Top Spring International Holdings Ltd. for you?
High Risk, Low Return
Absolute
Risk Adjusted
Volatility
Top Spring International Holdings Ltd.
-8.57%
-0.14
90.56%
Hang Seng Hong Kong
8.25%
0.41
19.93%
Quality key factors
Factor
Value
Sales Growth (5y)
-12.73%
EBIT Growth (5y)
-29.80%
EBIT to Interest (avg)
3.38
Debt to EBITDA (avg)
Negative Net Debt
Net Debt to Equity (avg)
0
Sales to Capital Employed (avg)
0
Tax Ratio
Tax Ratio is Negative%
Dividend Payout Ratio
0
Pledged Shares
0
Institutional Holding
0
ROCE (avg)
0
ROE (avg)
10.21%
Valuation Key Factors 
Factor
Value
P/E Ratio
1
Industry P/E
Price to Book Value
0.09
EV to EBIT
-1.51
EV to EBITDA
-1.48
EV to Capital Employed
-0.28
EV to Sales
-0.30
PEG Ratio
0.03
Dividend Yield
NA
ROCE (Latest)
Negative Capital Employed
ROE (Latest)
10.94%
Technical key factors
Indicator
Weekly
Monthly
MACD
Bearish
Mildly Bullish
RSI
Bearish
No Signal
Bollinger Bands
Mildly Bearish
Mildly Bearish
Moving Averages
Bearish (Daily)
KST
Bearish
Mildly Bullish
Dow Theory
Mildly Bullish
No Trend
OBV
No Trend
No Trend
Technical Movement
10What is working for the Company
OPERATING CASH FLOW(Y)
Highest at HKD 549.33 MM
INVENTORY TURNOVER RATIO(HY)
Highest at 0.32 times
NET SALES(Q)
At HKD 795.53 MM has Grown at 54.4%
NET PROFIT(Q)
At HKD 13.79 MM has Grown at 103.93%
-6What is not working for the Company
ROCE(HY)
Lowest at -29.51%
DEBT-EQUITY RATIO
(HY)
Highest at 82.15 %
RAW MATERIAL COST(Y)
Grown by 90.03% (YoY
CASH AND EQV(HY)
Lowest at HKD 1,111.07 MM
Here's what is working for Top Spring International Holdings Ltd.
Operating Cash Flow
Highest at HKD 549.33 MM and Grown
In each year in the last three yearsMOJO Watch
The company has generated higher cash revenues from business operations
Operating Cash Flows (HKD MM)
Net Sales
At HKD 795.53 MM has Grown at 54.4%
Year on Year (YoY)MOJO Watch
Near term sales trend is very positive
Net Sales (HKD MM)
Inventory Turnover Ratio
Highest at 0.32 times and Grown
In each half year in the last five Semi-Annual periodsMOJO Watch
Company has been able to sell its inventory faster
Inventory Turnover Ratio
Net Profit
At HKD 13.79 MM has Grown at 103.93%
Year on Year (YoY)MOJO Watch
Near term Net Profit trend is positive
Net Profit (HKD MM)
Here's what is not working for Top Spring International Holdings Ltd.
Debt-Equity Ratio
Highest at 82.15 % and Grown
In each half year in the last five Semi-Annual periodsMOJO Watch
The company is borrowing more to fund its operations; it's liquidity situation may be stressed
Debt-Equity Ratio
Cash and Eqv
Lowest at HKD 1,111.07 MM
in the last six Semi-Annual periodsMOJO Watch
Short Term liquidity is deteriorating
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Raw Material Cost
Grown by 90.03% (YoY)
MOJO Watch
The company's ability to pass on the cost of raw materials to customers has deteriorated; this may lead to a fall in profit margin
Raw Material Cost as a percentage of Sales






