Dashboard
Poor Management Efficiency with a low ROCE of 5.15%
- The company has been able to generate a Return on Capital Employed (avg) of 5.15% signifying low profitability per unit of total capital (equity and debt)
The company has declared negative results for the last 4 consecutive quarters
Risky - Negative EBITDA
Underperformed the market in the last 1 year
Stock DNA
Trading & Distributors
USD 33 Million (Micro Cap)
NA (Loss Making)
NA
0.00%
2.02
-49.29%
0.29
Total Returns (Price + Dividend) 
Solo Brands, Inc. for the last several years.
Risk Adjusted Returns v/s 
News
Is Solo Brands, Inc. technically bullish or bearish?
As of 8 September 2025, the technical trend for Solo Brands, Inc. has changed from mildly bullish to bullish. The weekly MACD is mildly bullish, while the monthly MACD is also mildly bullish. The monthly RSI indicates a bullish stance, although the weekly RSI shows no signal. Bollinger Bands are bullish on the weekly timeframe but mildly bearish on the monthly. Moving averages present a mildly bearish signal on the daily timeframe. The KST is bullish weekly but bearish monthly, and the Dow Theory shows a mildly bullish weekly stance and a mildly bearish monthly stance. The OBV is mildly bullish weekly but bearish monthly. In terms of performance, Solo Brands has significantly outperformed the S&P 500 over the past week and month, with returns of 26.86% and 108.76%, respectively, compared to the S&P 500's 1.05% and 2.33%. However, the year-to-date and one-year returns are notably negative at -56.6% and -67....
Read MoreIs Solo Brands, Inc. overvalued or undervalued?
As of 14 March 2024, the valuation grade for Solo Brands, Inc. has moved from attractive to risky, indicating a shift in perception regarding its financial health and market position. The company appears to be overvalued given its current metrics, particularly with a Price to Book Value of 0.08, an EV to EBIT of -6.80, and an EV to Sales ratio of 0.54. These ratios suggest significant challenges in profitability and valuation compared to its peers. In comparison to its industry peers, Solo Brands, Inc. has a notably negative EV to EBITDA of -29.29, while BlueLinx Holdings, Inc. is considered very expensive with a P/E of 25.45, and Hudson Technologies, Inc. is rated fair with an EV to EBITDA of 13.97. The company's recent stock performance has been volatile, with a 1-month return of 108.76%, significantly outperforming the S&P 500's 2.33% return, yet it has underperformed over the longer term, with a year-t...
Read More Announcements 
Corporate Actions 
Quality key factors 
Valuation key factors
Technicals key factors
Shareholding Snapshot : Mar 2025
Shareholding Compare (%holding) 
Strategic Entities
Held in 38 Schemes (15.14%)
Held by 33 Foreign Institutions (5.05%)
Quarterly Results Snapshot (Consolidated) - Jun'25 - YoY
YoY Growth in quarter ended Jun 2025 is -29.86% vs 0.53% in Jun 2024
YoY Growth in quarter ended Jun 2025 is -420.00% vs -134.78% in Jun 2024
Annual Results Snapshot (Consolidated) - Dec'24
YoY Growth in year ended Dec 2024 is -8.14% vs -4.40% in Dec 2023
YoY Growth in year ended Dec 2024 is 7.73% vs -2,469.74% in Dec 2023






