Compare M.V.K. Agro with Similar Stocks
Dashboard
Poor Management Efficiency with a low ROCE of 8.66%
- The company has been able to generate a Return on Capital Employed (avg) of 8.66% signifying low profitability per unit of total capital (equity and debt)
Low ability to service debt as the company has a high Debt to EBITDA ratio of 5.29 times
Flat results in Mar 26
With ROCE of 7.1, it has a Very Expensive valuation with a 3.8 Enterprise value to Capital Employed
Despite the size of the company, domestic mutual funds hold only 0% of the company
Total Returns (Price + Dividend) 
M.V.K. Agro for the last several years.
Risk Adjusted Returns v/s 
Returns Beta
News

M.V.K. Agro Food Product Ltd Technical Momentum Shifts Amid Bearish Signals
M.V.K. Agro Food Product Ltd, a micro-cap player in the sugar sector, has experienced a notable shift in its technical momentum, moving from a mildly bearish to a bearish trend. Despite a strong one-year return of 373.22%, recent technical indicators suggest caution as bearish signals dominate weekly and daily charts, reflecting increased selling pressure and volatility in the stock price.
Read full news article
M.V.K. Agro Food Product Ltd Quality Grade Upgrade Signals Fundamental Improvements
M.V.K. Agro Food Product Ltd, a micro-cap player in the sugar sector, has seen its quality grade improve from below average to average, reflecting a nuanced shift in its business fundamentals. Despite a modest Mojo Score of 30.0 and a Sell rating, the company’s financial metrics reveal both encouraging growth trends and persistent challenges, particularly in debt management and capital efficiency.
Read full news articleAre M.V.K. Agro Food Product Ltd latest results good or bad?
M.V.K. Agro Food Product Ltd's latest financial results for Q4 FY26 demonstrate a significant turnaround in operational performance compared to previous quarters. The company reported net sales of ₹133.94 crores, reflecting a quarter-on-quarter growth of 19.62% and a year-on-year increase of 387.59%. This robust revenue growth was accompanied by a notable surge in net profit, which reached ₹30.60 crores, marking a quarter-on-quarter increase of 200.29% and a year-on-year rise of 847.37%. The operating margin for the quarter improved to 21.76%, up from 12.70% in the previous quarter, indicating enhanced operational efficiency. Similarly, the PAT margin expanded to 22.85%, up from 9.10% in Q3 FY26. These results suggest that the company has effectively managed costs and improved profitability despite the inherent volatility in the sugar sector. However, it is important to note that while the operational me...
Read full news article Announcements 
Corporate Actions 
No Upcoming Board Meetings
No Dividend history available
No Splits history available
No Bonus history available
No Rights history available
Quality key factors 
Valuation key factors
Technicals key factors
Shareholding Snapshot : Mar 2026
Shareholding Compare (%holding) 
Promoters
None
Held by 0 Schemes
Held by 2 FIIs (0.04%)
Marotrao Vyankatrao Kawale (35.47%)
Kamya Abhishek Kamdar (3.89%)
37.88%
Quarterly Results Snapshot (Standalone) - Mar'26 - QoQ
QoQ Growth in quarter ended Mar 2026 is 59.41% vs 222.30% in Dec 2025
QoQ Growth in quarter ended Mar 2026 is 64.45% vs 162.12% in Dec 2025
Half Yearly Results Snapshot (Consolidated) - Sep'25
Growth in half year ended Sep 2025 is -44.78% vs 65.95% in Mar 2025
Growth in half year ended Sep 2025 is -21.42% vs 53.12% in Mar 2025
Nine Monthly Results Snapshot (Consolidated) - Dec'25
YoY Growth in nine months ended Dec 2025 is -14.02% vs -1.97% in Mar 2026
YoY Growth in nine months ended Dec 2025 is -57.33% vs -1.75% in Mar 2026
Annual Results Snapshot (Consolidated) - Mar'26
YoY Growth in year ended Mar 2026 is 113.64% vs 5.86% in Mar 2025
YoY Growth in year ended Mar 2026 is 399.79% vs 7.00% in Mar 2025






